Immigration Attorneys Who Are Distinguished

Lawyers for Deceased War Criminal Ask Ohio Appeals Court to Reinstate Citizenship

April 17, 2012

People in CourtLawyers for the late John Demjanjuk, the Ukrainian-born convicted Nazi war criminal, have petitioned the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati to restore his citizenship. As we reported in this Immigration Visa Lawyer Blog, an Ohio immigration judge declined to restore Demjanjuk’s citizenship in late 2011 after a German court convicted him as accessory to the murders of 27,900 Jews at three prison camps in Poland and Germany during World War II. The 91 year-old Demjanjuk died on March 17, 2012 in a nursing home in Germany, where he was awaiting the appeal of his conviction. His lawyers now argue that the government withheld documents that would have helped his immigration case.

The brief, filed on behalf of Demjanjuk’s estate on April 12, appeals the December 2011 refusal to reinstate his citizenship by denying a Rule 60 motion. Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a court to correct or vacate a prior order based, among other grounds, on newly-discovered evidence that was not previously available. Demjanjuk’s lawyers allege that the government violated its discovery obligations and committed fraud on the court by failing to reveal relevant documents, pursuant both to Demjanjuk’s discovery requests and prior court sanctions. This deprived Demjanjuk’s lawyers of materials needed to mount his defense. Documents from the mid-1980’s, declassified by the FBI in 2010 or 2011, reportedly described some of the critical evidence used against Demjanjuk as likely forgeries of the KGB. Demjanjuk’s lawyers claim to have found hundreds of recently-declassified files containing material, exculpatory documents.

Demjanjuk faced prosecution for his involvement in the Holocaust for several decades in multiple countries. He first immigrated to the United States in 1952, and became a naturalized citizen in 1958. The U.S. revoked his citizenship in 1981 based on evidence that he provided false or misleading information on immigration applications regarding his past involvement with the Nazi Party. An Israeli court sentenced him to death in 1988 after witnesses identified him as “Ivan the Terrible,” an infamous guard at the Sobibor and Treblinka death camps. That sentence was overturned in 1993 based on evidence that government officials withheld evidence, and that witnesses mistook Demjanjuk for a different guard. Demjanjuk returned to the United States.

Another prosecution, commenced in Germany in 2001, alleged that Demjanjuk served as a guard during World War II at the Majdanek and Sobibor camps in Poland and the Flossenburg camp in Germany. The United States deported Demjanjuk to Germany in 2009, and he was convicted on 27,900 counts of accessory to murder in May 2011. He appealed his conviction and five-year prison sentence, but the court did not rule before his death.

Demjanjuk’s appeal is based on purely procedural grounds, arguing that the United States never should have revoked his citizenship in the first place because it did so on flawed or incomplete evidence. An interesting technicality of German law may help his estate’s case. Because the courts never heard his appeal before his death, his conviction was never finalized, so he is “technically presumed innocent.”

Ohio immigration visa lawyer Gus Shihab helps people understand and navigate the U.S. immigration system, which includes the constantly-changing politics of our immigration laws. For a free and confidential consultation, contact us through our website or at 877-479-4USA (4872).

Web Resources

Brief of Appellant (PDF), United States v. Estate of Demjanjuk, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, April 12, 2012
More Blog Posts:

Immigration Judge Declares Former Salvadoran Politician Deportable Under Human Rights Law, Immigration Visa Lawyer Blog, March 8, 2012
Judge Orders Deportation of Accused Liberian Warlord, Immigration Visa Lawyer Blog, February 9, 2012
Controversial Arizona Sheriff Stripped of Authority to Conduct Immigration Screening, Immigration Visa Lawyer Blog, January 11, 2012

Client Reviews
I had a really hard case then after dealing with many attorneys I decided to work with Mr Shihab and his office and that was the best decision I took, how professional they are, how good and fast they are I was treated from day 1 like a family member not just a client Ramez
Atty. Shihab helped me navigate several issues that I had never faced before... he made it easy and supported me immediately if I had any questions, and his suggestions were top-notch. Avvo user
If you want to hire the best Immigration Attorney, hire Attorney Shihab. He will go above and beyond anyone's expectations, and stays on top of your case. He keeps you informed and up to date on deadlines, interviews and what to expect. Keith
Atty Shihab's record really speaks for itself, but more importantly, each client is treated with the upmost respect and dignity. He and his entire staff makes you feel as if you are the only client in their office. Rhonda
Mr. Shihab was recommended to me when the attorney my sister and I used failed to process our papers on time. From the beginning, I have consistently experienced exemplary service and very thorough knowledge of his profession. Amruta